By
Relatives of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre have reached a $73 million settlement with Remington, concluding a lawsuit that saw a gun manufacturer for the first time face potential liability following a mass shooting in the United States.
The landmark victory comes after a protracted legal battle over how Remington marketed its Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle, which was used in the December 2012 killings of 20 first-graders and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut. The gunman fatally shot his mother before the elementary school rampage, then killed himself.
“Today marks an inflection point,” Veronique de la Rosa, the mother of six-year-old victim Noah Pozner, said at a press conference Tuesday. “Today is a day of accountability for an industry that has thus far enjoyed operating with immunity and impunity, and for this I am grateful.”
In their lawsuit against Remington, which has since filed for bankruptcy, families of the victims argued that the gun maker irresponsibly marketed the weapon to at-risk young men such as the Sandy Hook shooter through product placement in violent video games.
Remington, based in Madison, North Carolina, has denied the allegations. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment from NBC News on Tuesday.
Attorney for the families, Joshua Koskoff, began Tuesday's press conference by displaying photos of the victims and described details about the final days of their lives: the Hanukkah candles that Noah proudly lit for the first time; the favorite diner breakfast that fellow first-grader Jesse Lewis loved to eat; the Christmas music that teacher Victoria Soto would listen to on her drive into work.
“These families would pay everything, give it all back, just for one minute” more with their loved ones, Koskoff said.
The path to a settlement was complicated, with the lawsuit making its way through the state Supreme Court after Remington argued it should be shielded under a federal law designed to prevent gun manufacturers from being held liable for crimes in which their guns were used. In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would allow the suit to go forward.
Last July, attorneys for Remington offered nearly $33 million to settle the suit. At the time, Koskoff praised Remington’s insurers for their offer, even though the families did not accept.
Then in September, Remington subpoenaed school records of children and educators killed in the massacre.
Attorneys for the families immediately moved to seal those records.
“We have no explanation for why Remington subpoenaed the Newtown Public School District to obtain the kindergarten and first-grade academic, attendance and disciplinary records of these five schoolchildren,” Koskoff said, The Connecticut Post reported. “The records cannot possibly excuse Remington’s egregious marketing conduct, or be of any assistance in estimating the catastrophic damages in this case. The only relevant part of their attendance records is that they were at their desks on December 14, 2012.”
Parents and other relatives of the victims spoke of their hopes Tuesday that this settlement would prevent other families from experiencing the pain that they had by setting a new precedent for the firearm industry.
"Our legal system has given us some justice today," said Francine Wheeler, mother of first-grader Benjamin Wheeler.
"True justice would be our 15-year-old, healthy and standing next to us right now, but Benny will never be 15," she added. "He will be six forever, because he is gone forever. Today is about what is right and what is wrong."
While I have not seen the marketing adds of the guns by Remington that are at issue, as a general rule I think it is completely asinine to blame the gun manufacturer for the misuse of it products in a heinous and illegal manner. Perhaps there is some culpability for Remington because of their marketing, but I suspect a similar case can be made against Ford Motor Company because of the sick bastard that ran down all of those people in Wisconsin in his Explorer at the Christmas parade last year, which was probably glorified in other video games like Grand Theft Auto.
ReplyDeleteIf we don't teach people wrong from right and hold them accountable for their actions then none of this matters. As horrific as these murders in Sandy Hook were, it was not the gun that was at fault. It was the sicko that killed them all that is to blame. A Bushmaster rifle is no more capable of killing someone on its own than is a Ford Explorer. It is the operator and their intentions that are culpable here, in my opinion.
There is a law against holding gun manufactures from fault. As the article says, that's why the case went to the high court and that court gave permission to go forward with the case. I wonder if the case would be dismissed by another court upholding the standing law that gun manufactures cannot be held at fault?
ReplyDeleteThis is important because it will become a legal precedent and could eventually overturn the law that shields gun companies from fault.
As the article stated, Remington has already filed for bankruptcy.
This will do nothing to stop mass shootings. It could put gun companies out of business, so if you have a gun its value will escalate, so hold on to it.
I don't blame the families reaching out for anything to get relief from their grief. I am surprised by the court's decision in the face of a long-standing law that shields gun companies from fault.
Is it asinine? Making asinine decisions is normal for our justice system including juries.
Delete