Sunday, September 30, 2018

James Comey: The F.B.I. Can Do This

A reprint from the New York Times Opinion page written by James Comey.

Despite limitations and partisan attacks, the bureau can find out a lot about the Kavanaugh accusations in a week.

By James Comey

Mr. Comey is the former F.B.I. director.


The F.B.I. is back in the middle of it. When we were handed the Hillary Clinton email investigation in 2015, the bureau’s deputy director said to me, “You know you are totally screwed, right?” He meant that, in a viciously polarized political environment, one side was sure to be furious with the outcome. Sure enough, I saw a tweet declaring me “a political hack,” although the author added, tongue in cheek: “I just can’t figure out which side.”

And those were the good old days. President Trump’s decision to order a one-week investigation into sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, his Supreme Court nominee, comes in a time of almost indescribable pain and anger, lies and attacks.

We live in a world where the president routinely attacks the F.B.I. because he fears its work. He calls for his enemies to be prosecuted and his friends freed. We also live in a world where a sitting federal judge channels the president by shouting attacks at the Senate committee considering his nomination and demanding to know if a respected senator has ever passed out from drinking. We live in a world where the president is an accused serial abuser of women, who was caught on tape bragging about his ability to assault women and now likens the accusations against his nominee to the many “false” accusations against him. 

Most disturbingly, we live in a world where millions of Republicans and their representatives think nearly everything in the previous paragraph is O.K.

In that world, the F.B.I. is now being asked to investigate, on a seven-day clock, sexual assaults that the president says never happened, that some senators have decried as a sham cooked up to derail a Supreme Court nominee, and that other senators believe beyond all doubt were committed by the nominee. 

If truth were the only goal, there would be no clock, and the investigation wouldn’t have been sought after the Senate Judiciary Committee already endorsed the nominee. Instead, it seems that the Republican goal is to be able to say there was an investigation and it didn’t change their view, while the Democrats hope for incriminating evidence to derail the nominee.

Although the process is deeply flawed, and apparently designed to thwart the fact-gathering process, the F.B.I. is up for this. It’s not as hard as Republicans hope it will be. 

F.B.I. agents are experts at interviewing people and quickly dispatching leads to their colleagues around the world to follow with additional interviews. Unless limited in some way by the Trump administration, they can speak to scores of people in a few days, if necessary. 

They will confront people with testimony and other accounts, testing them and pushing them in a professional way. Agents have much better nonsense detectors than partisans, because they aren’t starting with a conclusion.

Yes, the alleged incident occurred 36 years ago. But F.B.I. agents know time has very little to do with memory. They know every married person remembers the weather on their wedding day, no matter how long ago. Significance drives memory. They also know that little lies point to bigger lies. They know that obvious lies by the nominee about the meaning of words in a yearbook are a flashing signal to dig deeper.

Once they start interviewing, every witness knows the consequences. It is one thing to have your lawyer submit a statement on your behalf. It is a very different thing to sit across from two F.B.I. special agents and answer their relentless questions. Of course, the bureau won’t have subpoena power, only the ability to knock on doors and ask questions. But most people will speak to them. Refusal to do so is its own kind of statement.

Agents will summarize every witness encounter in a detailed report called a 302, and then synthesize all the interviews into an executive summary for the White House. Although the F.B.I. won’t reach conclusions, their granular factual presentation will spotlight the areas of conflict and allow decision makers to reach their own conclusions.

It is idiotic to put a shot clock on the F.B.I. But it is better to give professionals seven days to find facts than have no professional investigation at all. When the week is up, one team (and maybe both) will be angry at the F.B.I. The president will condemn the bureau for being a corrupt nest of Clinton-lovers if they turn up bad facts. Maybe Democrats will similarly condemn agents as Trumpists if they don’t. As strange as it sounds, there is freedom in being totally screwed. Agents can just do their work. Find facts. Speak truth to power.

Despite all the lies and all the attacks, there really are people who just want to figure out what’s true. The F.B.I. is full of them.

The Troggs


                                                                   Love Is All Around

Saturday, September 29, 2018

White House Puts Limits On FBI’s Kavanaugh Investigation

The agency reportedly won’t be allowed to look into another allegation from Kavanaugh’s high school days.

 By Sara Boboltz

The FBI has contacted a second woman who alleges sexual misconduct on the part of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple outlets reported Saturday. The agency, however, will reportedly leave Kavanaugh’s third accuser alone upon request from the White House.
According to reports from NBC News and The Wall Street Journal also out Saturday, White House has put tight limits on the FBI investigation into Kavanaugh’s alleged misconduct.
The constraints mean that authorities may not be able to interview all available leads, the outlets reported. According to NBC, the FBI will specifically not be able to question Kavanaugh’s Yale classmates about his drinking habits, even though alcohol plays into all three accusers’ claims about the nominee, who denies ever drinking to the point of not remembering certain events.
The FBI wasted little time reaching out to Deborah Ramirez, who says Kavanaugh thrust his exposed penis in her face at a Yale party in the 1980s. Her lawyer confirmed the agency already contacted Ramirez for an interview and that she intends to cooperate, but offered no further comment.
Ramirez came forward after Christine Blasey Ford publicly accused the nominee of sexually assaulting her at a high school party in 1982.
The third accuser, Julie Swetnick, says she saw Kavanaugh and friend Mark Judge at high school parties where girls were raped by multiple teenage boys, but stopped short of explicitly accusing Kavanaugh of doing so himself. Judge also appeared in Blasey’s story as the sole witness to her assault. Blasey says she managed to escape the alleged attack by Kavanaugh after Judge jumped on top of the two of them.
A lawyer for Judge indicated his client also plans to cooperate with the FBI.
President Donald Trump told reporters on Saturday that the agency has “free rein” to do “whatever they have to do, whatever it is they do.”
“They’ll be doing things that we have never even thought of,” Trump said. “And hopefully at the conclusion everything will be fine.”
The White House formally asked the FBI to reopen its background investigation into Kavanaugh on Friday, one day after Blasey detailed her claims before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Earlier Friday, committee Republicans had shocked observers by agreeing in a last-minute move prompted by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) to request a formal investigation into the claims of misconduct.

UPDATE:

Trump swears the above report is a lie and he did not limit the investigation. I'm sure we will hear more about this on the Sunday morning news programs and throughout the week. We will know when the FBI presents its findings to the committee next week. 

Cream


                                                                         I Feel Free

Friday, September 28, 2018

Johnny Rivers


                                                                    Mountain of Love

Thursday, September 27, 2018

Long John Baldry



                            Don't Try to Lay No Boogie-Woogie on the King of Rock and Roll

Apathy

As the old saying goes, actions speak louder than words.

The actions of the Republican led Judiciary Committee and Judge Kavanaugh shows they are lying.

Bret Kavanaugh has already been caught lying under oath. He lied in his FOX news interview. Why would we expect him to tell the truth now?

Did you watch Trump's press conference yesterday afternoon? What a pack of lies! The guy is truly delusional. Talk about a con artist, Trump has been conning people for 50 years.  

It's no wonder people don't vote and ignore their government's actions. This Supreme Court nominee hearing and the actions by the Judiciary Committee is a perfect example why. It's a total joke. The lack of honesty and fairness just in the process alone, screams ridiculousness. The decision will effect millions, but the dishonesty just makes millions of people not care and they refuse to become involved in such a farce.

I believe that's the same attitude millions of Americans took during the election after the Republicans nominated Trump as their candidate for president.

If you want to learn a lesson watching the hearings today (less than 8 hours from now) watch how professionals lie. Watch how lawyers appear to make honest people's statements lies. Watch just how slimy and corrupt your government is.

I don't blame those who refuse to vote, or get involved. I blame those who are involved and claim to have a passion for politics and their government. They are the ones who have guided us to this dishonest and corrupt situation. They are the one who have brought forth these criminal politicians. They are the one willing to lie and spend millions to make sure their slimy candidate wins.

Senator McCain, who was praised as a hero of bi-partisanship recently after his death, supported Republicans and their strategy to deny Obama his pick for the Supreme Court. McCain was perfectly fine with denying Garland a seat on the Supreme Court. Yet, he is being hailed as the example of how Senators should act.

As for me, I will always vote. It was ingrained in me 50 years ago, but I understand the apathy and I won't blame those who are fed up with politics and refuse to involve themselves. As for me, I believe Kavanaugh is lying and should not be on the Supreme Court, but I thought the same about Thomas and he has been sitting on the court for decades. I have a hard time convincing others they should get involved, because they will make a difference, in fact, I have stopped trying. The facts tell them differently.  

Cat Stevens - Angelsea



Wednesday, September 26, 2018


Donovan


                                                                            Atlantis

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Patsy Cline


                                                                         Sweet Dreams

The Kavanaugh Tale

The worst that can happen to Bret Kavanaugh is he does not get enough votes to be approved for the Supreme Court. He would still remain on the second highest court in America with a lifetime tenure.

Will the Democrats seek to impeach him from that position, or will the Democrats declare victory if they stop him from being appointed to the Supreme Court?

Kavanaugh would then become a foot note in history and sit on the bench the rest of his life making unjust decisions as he has been for years, effecting millions of citizens.

Just a few weeks ago I wrote about 15 lifetime Republican judge appointments that passed through without any debate. Who knows what kind of scum got through because of no investigations, or debate?

Trump has one thing correct; he and the Republicans have been very successful in getting conservative judges appointed to the highest courts in America. That goes a long way to affecting the lives of millions of Americans and the justice they get from their government, which will last for decades, since these are lifetime appointments.

In the old days there were no public hearings on Supreme Court justice nominees, or other federal court nominees. The president would nominate and the Justice Committee would approve, or disapprove usually on party line votes. The Justice Committee never met with these nominees and rarely asked them questions, which were put in writing to the nominee if they had questions.

Ongoing, there should be much deeper investigations and debate on all judgeship's, especially federal lifetime appointed judge nominees. There is a Senate rule that each federal judge nominee should get at least 30 hours of debate, but Schumer allowed that rule to pass when those 15 were approved without debate weeks ago.

Appointing Supreme Court judges was a big issue during the election and that importance was brought to Americans when Republicans denied Obama his pick for the Supreme Court and delayed that pick until they had the White House. 

If it was not clear to Americans before, Americans must know by now just how important these judicial appointments are, which explains some of the screwy decisions we get from judges like Kavanaugh who have been getting a free pass to sit on the highest courts in our land. 

Monday, September 24, 2018

Another Charge of Sexual Misconduct Against Kavanaugh

Sen. Feinstein says the nomination proceedings should be immediately postponed.
Kavanaugh sternly denied the new allegation.
This sounds like the straw that broke Kavanaugh's conformation. 
Lets see what Sen. Grassley says later this morning.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, new polls out this morning shows the voters are going to vote against Trump and Republicans at the mid-term elections just weeks away. 60% say they are against the Republicans and Trump. That might mean Democrats getting majority in both Houses, putting an end to Republican and Trump dictator rule.

Get out and VOTE Democratic!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, McConnell and Ryan are telling Trump to sign the new budget bill. Trump says he might not, because it does not include money for his wall. Ryan said he has bi-partisan support for the bill and plenty of votes. Ryan did not say he had enough votes to override Trump's veto.  Trump's Republican base in the House is very upset with the new budget bill.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this the beginning of the end for Trump? If Democrats get majority in both Houses it may very well be depending on wether, or not Democrats decide to play hardball, and they should.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also, Rod Rosenstein says he never seriously discussed a 25th amendment process to get Trump out of office. I understand he is protecting his job and therefore protecting Muller and his investigation; but Rosenstein seems like a smart fellow and any smart fellow would know that Trump should be removed from office, because Trump is mentally delusional. Rosenstein is not a cabinet member anyways, so if he said that he had no power to follow through on it, and I doubt anyone in the cabinet would listen to his pleas to start a 25th amendment process. .

Don McLean


                                                                              Crying

Dr. Ford to Testify

It seems Dr. Ford will testify in front of the Judicial Committee and on national television; without the FBI doing any investigation about her charges against Kavanaugh.

So the Republicans get their he said, she said show down and will vote Kavanaugh the next Supreme Court Justice.

Republicans don't care what the public thinks about its tactics, they achieved their goal, another right wing conservative on the Supreme Court with lifetime tenure. The balance on the Supreme Court will now be slanted enough to overturn decades of accepted law like Roe/Wade, but the Supreme Court won't stop at just overturning Roe/Wade.

The Republicans probably will lose majority because of this Supreme Court nominee issue, in fact, I think it might be the issue that turns this country away from decades of conservative voting. Add Trump's incompetence and disgusting behavior, I am sure the voters will be more liberal in the future. There has to be "a straw that breaks the camel's back" and this may well be it. But the Democrats could see much of their legislative efforts (when they regain majority) be struck down by a conservative Supreme Court, that will be conservative for a long time.

As for Dr. Ford, she might have been better off giving her testimony off camera to the committee saving herself more public humiliation. Without the FBI investigating her charges she was left with a he said, she said position against a bunch of women hating Senators. She had no chance, especially since the Republicans were willing to chance losing majority at the elections in order to get another one of their kind on the Supreme Court. Dr. Ford's life is changed forever and having to tell her painful story did not stop Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. Sen. Feinstein has to take the blame for that, because Dr. Ford asked her not to make her accusations public multiple times, which begs the question, why would Dr. Ford write that letter to the Senator if she was not willing to go public? Dr. Ford should have known her name would become public, these things always leak out.

Republicans may not think Trump will be impeached (which is still a real possibility) but they certainly know the polls are against them and will get worse because of their dirty tactics and their delusional president. They are bound to lose majority, if not by the mid-term elections certainly by the 2020 elections, and they know it, but they will have the Supreme Court for a long time to come. 

It's political hardball and I'm sure the Republicans see it as a win for them, and so do I. 

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Andrew Lloyd Weber


                                                             The Music of the Night

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Minnesota Lawmaker Drops Re-Election Bid After Daughter Claims He Molested Her

State Rep. Jim Knoblach abandoned his campaign after learning that Minnesota Public Radio News was publishing his daughter’s allegations.

 By Carla Herreria

A Minnesota state representative has abandoned his re-election bid after learning that Minnesota Public Radio News was working with his daughter on a story about her accusations that he inappropriately touched her for years.
In a statement on Friday, state Rep. Jim Knoblach (R) said he learned last week that his 23-year-old daughter, Laura Knoblach, contacted MPR with the accusations, which led him to end his campaign for the Minnesota House of Representatives.
She first publicly accused her father of behaving inappropriately toward her in a December 2016 Facebook post, which has since been deleted. In that post, obtained by MPR News, she said she was “molested as a child and young adult” by her father.

Laura Knoblach, who was a student athlete at the University of Colorado at Boulder, also accused her family members of threatening her and coercing her “into silence about it for almost 15 years.”
MPR News on Friday published a damning report that shed light on her claims of abuse and her family’s attempts to keep her quiet.
On Friday, Jim Knoblach said the allegations were false and described his daughter as estranged from the family. He noted that the accusations were investigated and dismissed by Sherburne County.
“I and other family members have made repeated attempts to reconcile with her in recent years, but she has refused,” he said.

Laura Knoblach told MPR News that her father’s inappropriate behavior started when she was 9 years old. In one instance, she said, he went into her room, got into her bed with her, licked her neck and bit her ear.

She said that kind of behavior happened often, including while they watched movies together on the couch, according to MPR News. In more than 30 instances, she said, he approached her from behind, then pressed his body against hers up against a refrigerator or dishwasher.
This type of abuse continued until she was 21 years old, she told the station.
According to MPR journalist Nina Moini, she first began looking into Laura Knoblach’s claims after the 2016 Facebook post. Moini interviewed Knoblach for four hours in July, reviewed a St. Cloud Police Department investigation into the accusations and spoke with the friends, family members and “trusted adults” whom Knoblach confided in and who were interviewed by police.

Jim Knoblach served in the state House from 1995 to 2007. He was elected to the House again in 2014 and is currently the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
“I could fight on for another six weeks to defend my reputation while running for re-election. But this would entail subjecting my wife, son, and elderly parents, as well as my daughter, to six weeks of extreme stress and scrutiny,” he wrote in a statement released on Friday.

River Lady


                                                                      Roger Whittaker

Keith Ellison's Ex-Girlfriend Shares Medical Record Alleging Abuse




ST. PAUL — U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison's ex-girlfriend has posted what appears to be a medical record showing that she told her doctor in 2017 that Ellison has physically abused her.
In several tweets early this week, Karen Monahan posted a picture of what appears to be a computer printout of notes from a Park Nicollet Health Services doctor treating her.

The report names Ellison, who is running for state attorney general and has denied the allegation, and says Monahan feared retribution if she identified him publicly.

"She states that she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner with whom she is now separated," the notes read, in part. "She did not have any physical injuries that required a physical examination in the past. She identifies the individual as congressmen (sic) Ellison, and she is worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly."

The report from Nov. 28, 2017, could be seen to support her previous statements that she had told others about the alleged abuse — which she leveled days before the Aug. 14 primary — that Ellison once dragged her off a bed while yelling profanities at her in 2017.

Ellison has denied the event ever took place.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press has been unable to confirm the authenticity of the document. A spokeswoman for HealthPartners (Park Nicollet is part of HealthPartners) said she was "unable to confirm this document as it would be a violation of patient privacy."

Monahan has not responded to a request for comment.

Ellison's campaign declined to comment beyond his initial denials.

Other evidence?

Monahan's doctor would be among several people who have said she told of abuse by Ellison, with whom she lived for a period after he was divorced.

CNN has reported that three of Monahan's friends, who refused to allow their names to be published, have said Monahan told them of the alleged incident at the time. In September, she tweeted that "Four people, including my supervisor at the time, stated that I came to them after and shared the exact story I shared publicly."

Monahan works as an organizer for the Sierra Club's North Star chapter.
Monahan's adult son, Austin, said he watched a video of the incident he found on his mother's computer in 2017. It was Austin Monahan who first named Ellison publicly in an August Facebook post.

Monahan said she made the video of the alleged incident with her cellphone in Ellison's Minneapolis apartment, where she was staying after the two had broken up, and has since done a single TV interview in which she discusses it.

She has refused to release any part of the video or show any of it to news organizations, saying it's humiliating.

Earlier this week, she said in a tweet: "I don't have to show a video that shows me in a vulnerable position. Did they even think what I may or may not have been wearing?" At one point last month she told CNN she didn't know where the video was, that it was on a thumb drive that might be in storage or gotten lost during a move.

The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, which endorsed Ellison after the allegations surfaced, has opened its own investigation. A spokeswoman for the DFL referred questions to party Chairman Ken Martin, who could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Monahan previously said she had furnished the party with medical records.

She previously made public some texts between her and Ellison. They show a strained relationship, but do not show direct evidence of physical abuse.

Aside from the one allegation of physical abuse, much of Monahan's public criticism of Ellison accuses him of "narcissistic abuse," a term sometimes applied to what is often called emotional abuse.

Friday, September 21, 2018

Legality of Abortion Before Roe/Wade by State




 
Abortion laws in the United States prior to Roe vs. Wade
   Illegal.
   Legal in cases of rape.
   Legal in cases of danger to woman's health.
   Legal in cases of danger to woman's health, rape or incest, or likely damaged fetus.
   Legal upon request


If Roe/Wade is overturned by the Supreme Court, abortions would become illegal in every State. The States would have to pass abortion, or anti-abortion laws individually, as it was before Roe/Wade.

The Federal government could make abortions illegal in every State in the Union, if both Houses passed such bills and the Supreme Court voted approval of those bills in an at least 5-4 majority.

It's very plausible the Supreme Court could overturn Roe/Wade, especially when the Republicans get one more judge on the Supreme Court. I doubt both Houses of Congress would pass bills to make  abortion illegal throughout the country. They would not have the votes for that. Another scenario would be if the Supreme Court had the correct worded case to decide the Supreme Court could outlaw States from allowing abortions, then the Congress would have to pass a law allowing States to have abortions if they wanted.

As you can see, only 4 States had abortion on demand before Roe/Wade.

Donovan


                                                                      Catch the Wind

Thursday, September 20, 2018

Rubylove


                                                                          Cat Stevens

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

GOP Not Waiting To Hear Testimony

Delaying a Supreme Court confirmation vote until after an election isn’t anything new. Republicans did it with Merrick Garland.

By Marina Fang

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday argued that the Senate Judiciary Committee should proceed “as soon as possible” with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation, saying that a longer process would be “not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections.”
His comments hint at a concern of many Republicans: that they need to confirm Kavanaugh quickly in case the GOP loses its chance if Democrats take back control of the Senate in November’s election.
Graham tweeted that the committee should not honor the request of Christine Blasey Ford, who goes by Christine Blasey professionally, that the FBI investigate her sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh before she testifies.

Requiring an FBI investigation of a 36 year old allegation (without specific references to time or location) before Professor Ford will appear before the Judiciary Committee is not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections.

Simon and Garfunkel


                                                   For Emily Whenever I May Find Her

Monday, September 17, 2018

8 Miles High


                                                                        Leo Kottke

Clinton's Full Op-Ed from the Atlantic

American Democracy in Crisis

Our democratic institutions and traditions are under siege. We need to do everything we can to fight back.

By Hillary Clinton

It’s been nearly two years since Donald Trump won enough Electoral College votes to become president of the United States. On the day after, in my concession speech, I said, “We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.” I hoped that my fears for our future were overblown.
 
They were not.

In the roughly 21 months since he took the oath of office, Trump has sunk far below the already-low bar he set for himself in his ugly campaign. Exhibit A is the unspeakable cruelty that his administration has inflicted on undocumented families arriving at the border, including separating children, some as young as eight months, from their parents. According to The New York Times, the administration continues to detain 12,800 children right now, despite all the outcry and court orders. Then there’s the president’s monstrous neglect of Puerto Rico: After Hurricane Maria ravaged the island, his administration barely responded. Some 3,000 Americans died. Now Trump flatly denies those deaths were caused by the storm. And, of course, despite the recent indictments of several Russian military intelligence officers for hacking the Democratic National Committee in 2016, he continues to dismiss a serious attack on our country by a foreign power as a “hoax.”

Trump and his cronies do so many despicable things that it can be hard to keep track. I think that may be the point—to confound us, so it’s harder to keep our eye on the ball. The ball, of course, is protecting American democracy. As citizens, that’s our most important charge. And right now, our democracy is in crisis.

I don’t use the word crisis lightly. There are no tanks in the streets. The administration’s malevolence may be constrained on some fronts—for now—by its incompetence. But our democratic institutions and traditions are under siege. We need to do everything we can to fight back. There’s not a moment to lose.
As I see it, there are five main fronts of this assault on our democracy.

First, there is Donald Trump’s assault on the rule of law.

John Adams wrote that the definition of a republic is “a government of laws, and not of men.” That ideal is enshrined in two powerful principles: No one, not even the most powerful leader, is above the law, and all citizens are due equal protection under the law. Those are big ideas, radical when America was formed and still vital today. The Founders knew that a leader who refuses to be subject to the law or who politicizes or obstructs its enforcement is a tyrant, plain and simple.

That sounds a lot like Donald Trump. He told The New York Times, “I have an absolute right to do what I want to with the Justice Department.” Back in January, according to that paper, Trump’s lawyers sent Special Counsel Robert Mueller a letter making that same argument: If Trump interferes with an investigation, it’s not obstruction of justice, because he’s the president.

The Times also reported that Trump told White House aides that he had expected Attorney General Jeff Sessions to protect him, regardless of the law. According to Jim Comey, the president demanded that the FBI director pledge his loyalty not to the Constitution but to Trump himself. And he has urged the Justice Department to go after his political opponents, violating an American tradition reaching back to Thomas Jefferson. After the bitterly contentious election of 1800, Jefferson could have railed against “Crooked John Adams” and tried to jail his supporters. Instead, Jefferson used his inaugural address to declare: “We are all republicans, we are all federalists.”

Second, the legitimacy of our elections is in doubt.

There’s Russia’s ongoing interference and Trump’s complete unwillingness to stop it or protect us. There’s voter suppression, as Republicans put onerous—and I believe illegal—requirements in place to stop people from voting. There’s gerrymandering, with partisans—these days, principally Republicans—drawing the lines for voting districts to ensure that their party nearly always wins. All of this carries us further away from the sacred principle of “one person, one vote.”

Third, the president is waging war on truth and reason.

Earlier this month, Trump made 125 false or misleading statements in 120 minutes, according to The Washington Post—a personal record for him (at least since becoming president). To date, according to the paper’s fact-checkers, Trump has made 5,000 false or misleading claims while in office and recently has averaged 32 a day.

Trump is also going after journalists with even greater fervor and intent than before. No one likes to be torn apart in the press—I certainly don’t—but when you’re a public official, it comes with the job. You get criticized a lot. You learn to take it. You push back and make your case, but you don’t fight back by abusing your power or denigrating the entire enterprise of a free press. Trump doesn’t hide his intent one bit. Lesley Stahl, the 60 Minutes reporter, asked Trump during his campaign why he’s always attacking the press. He said, “I do it to discredit you all and demean you all, so when you write negative stories about me, no one will believe you.”

When we can’t trust what we hear from our leaders, experts, and news sources, we lose our ability to hold people to account, solve problems, comprehend threats, judge progress, and communicate effectively with one another—all of which are crucial to a functioning democracy.

Fourth, there’s Trump’s breathtaking corruption.

 Considering that this administration promised to “drain the swamp,” it’s amazing how blithely the president and his Cabinet have piled up conflicts of interest, abuses of power, and blatant violations of ethics rules. Trump is the first president in 40 years to refuse to release his tax returns. He has refused to put his assets in a blind trust or divest himself of his properties and businesses, as previous presidents did. This has created unprecedented conflicts of interest, as industry lobbyists, foreign governments, and Republican organizations do business with Trump’s companies or hold lucrative events at his hotels, golf courses, and other properties. They are putting money directly into his pocket. He’s profiting off the business of the presidency.

Trump makes no pretense of prioritizing the public good above his own personal or political interests. He doesn’t seem to understand that public servants are supposed to serve the public, not the other way around. The Founders believed that for a republic to succeed, wise laws, robust institutions, and a brilliant Constitution would not be enough. Civic, republican virtue was the secret sauce that would make the whole system work. Donald Trump may well be the least lowercase-R republican president we’ve ever had.

Fifth, Trump undermines the national unity that makes democracy possible.

Democracies are rowdy by nature. We debate freely and disagree forcefully. It’s part of what distinguishes us from authoritarian societies, where dissent is forbidden. But we’re held together by deep “bonds of affection,” as Abraham Lincoln said, and by the shared belief that out of our fractious melting pot comes a unified whole that’s stronger than the sum of our parts.

At least, that’s how it’s supposed to work. Trump doesn’t even try to pretend he’s a president for all Americans. It’s hard to ignore the racial subtext of virtually everything Trump says. Often, it’s not even subtext. When he says that Haitian and African immigrants are from “shithole countries,” that’s impossible to misunderstand. Same when he says that an American judge can’t be trusted because of his Mexican heritage. None of this is a mark of authenticity or a refreshing break from political correctness. Hate speech isn’t “telling it like it is.” It’s just hate.

I don’t know whether Trump ignores the suffering of Puerto Ricans because he doesn’t know that they’re American citizens, because he assumes people with brown skin and Latino last names probably aren’t Trump fans, or because he just doesn’t have the capacity for empathy. And I don’t know whether he makes a similar judgment when he lashes out at NFL players protesting against systemic racism or when he fails to condemn hate crimes against Muslims. I do know he’s quick to defend or praise those whom he thinks are his people—like how he bent over backwards to defend the “very fine people” among the white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia. The message he sends by his lack of concern and respect for some Americans is unmistakable. He is saying that some of us don’t belong, that all people are not created equal, and that some are not endowed by their Creator with the same inalienable rights as others.

And it’s not just what he says. From day one, his administration has undermined civil rights that previous generations fought to secure and defend. There have been high-profile edicts like the Muslim travel ban and the barring of transgender Americans from serving in the military. Other actions have been quieter but just as insidious. The Department of Justice has largely abandoned oversight of police departments that have a history of civil-rights abuses and has switched sides in voting-rights cases. Nearly every federal agency has scaled back enforcement of civil-rights protections. All the while, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is running wild across the country. Federal agents are confronting citizens just for speaking Spanish, dragging parents away from children.

How did we get here?

Trump may be uniquely hostile to the rule of law, ethics in public service, and a free press. But the assault on our democracy didn’t start with his election. He is as much a symptom as a cause of what ails us. Think of our body politic like a human body, with our constitutional checks and balances, democratic norms and institutions, and well-informed citizenry all acting as an immune system protecting us from the disease of authoritarianism. Over many years, our defenses were worn down by a small group of right-wing billionaires—people like the Mercer family and Charles and David Koch—who spent a lot of time and money building an alternative reality where science is denied, lies masquerade as truth, and paranoia flourishes. By undermining the common factual framework that allows a free people to deliberate together and make the important decisions of self-governance, they opened the way for the infection of Russian propaganda and Trumpian lies to take hold. They've used their money and influence to capture our political system, impose a right-wing agenda, and disenfranchise millions of Americans.

I don’t agree with critics who say that capitalism is fundamentally incompatible with democracy—but unregulated, predatory capitalism certainly is. Massive economic inequality and corporate monopoly power are antidemocratic and corrode the American way of life.

 Meanwhile, hyperpolarization now extends beyond politics into nearly every part of our culture. One recent study found that in 1960, just 5 percent of Republicans and 4 percent of Democrats said they’d be displeased if their son or daughter married a member of the other political party. In 2010, 49 percent of Republicans and 33 percent of Democrats said they’d be upset by that. The strength of partisan identity—and animosity—helps explain why so many Republicans continue to back a president so manifestly unfit for office and antithetical to many of the values and policies they once held dear. When you start seeing politics as a zero-sum game and view members of the other party as traitors, criminals, or otherwise illegitimate, then the normal give-and-take of politics turns into a blood sport.

There is a tendency, when talking about these things, to wring our hands about “both sides.” But the truth is that this is not a symmetrical problem. We should be clear about this: The increasing radicalism and irresponsibility of the Republican Party, including decades of demeaning government, demonizing Democrats, and debasing norms, is what gave us Donald Trump. Whether it was abusing the filibuster and stealing a Supreme Court seat, gerrymandering congressional districts to disenfranchise African Americans, or muzzling government climate scientists, Republicans were undermining American democracy long before Trump made it to the Oval Office.

Now we must do all we can to save our democracy and heal our body politic.

First, we’ve got to mobilize massive turnout in the 2018 midterms. There are fantastic candidates running all over the country, making their compelling cases every day about how they’ll raise wages, bring down health-care costs, and fight for justice. If they win, they’ll do great things for America. And we could finally see some congressional oversight of the White House.

When the dust settles, we have to do some serious housecleaning. After Watergate, Congress passed a whole slew of reforms in response to Richard Nixon’s abuses of power. After Trump, we’re going to need a similar process. For example, Trump’s corruption should teach us that all future candidates for president and presidents themselves should be required by law to release their tax returns. They also should not be exempt from ethics requirements and conflict-of-interest rules.

A main area of reform should be improving and protecting our elections. The Senate Intelligence Committee has made a series of bipartisan recommendations for how to better secure America’s voting systems, including paper ballot backups, vote audits, and better coordination among federal, state, and local authorities on cybersecurity. That’s a good start. Congress should also repair the damage the Supreme Court did to the Voting Rights Act by restoring the full protections that voters need and deserve, as well as the voting rights of Americans who have served time in prison and paid their debt to society. We need early voting and voting by mail in every state in America, and automatic, universal voter registration so every citizen who is eligible to vote is able to vote. We need to overturn Citizens United and get secret money out of our politics. And you won’t be surprised to hear that I passionately believe it’s time to abolish the Electoral College.

But even the best rules and regulations won’t protect us if we don’t find a way to restitch our fraying social fabric and rekindle our civic spirit. There are concrete steps that would help, like greatly expanding national-service programs and bringing back civics education in our schools. We also need systemic economic reforms that reduce inequality and the unchecked power of corporations and give a strong voice to working families. And ultimately, healing our country will come down to each of us, as citizens and individuals, doing the work—trying to reach across divides of race, class, and politics and see through the eyes of people very different from ourselves. When we think about politics and judge our leaders, we can’t just ask, “Am I better off than I was four years ago?” We have to ask, “Are we better off? Are we as a country better, stronger, and fairer?” Democracy works only when we accept that we’re all in this together.

In 1787, after the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked by a woman on the street outside Independence Hall, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin answered, “A republic, if you can keep it.” That response has been on my mind a lot lately. The contingency of it. How fragile our experiment in self-government is. And, when viewed against the sweep of human history, how fleeting. Democracy may be our birthright as Americans, but it’s not something we can ever take for granted. Every generation has to fight for it, has to push us closer to that more perfect union. That time has come again.




Sunday, September 16, 2018

Down To Zero


Texas Children's Education

The Texas State Board of Education voted Friday to remove mentions of Hillary Clinton and Helen Keller from the state’s mandatory history curriculum — but will keep in Moses’ influence on U.S. founding documents, The Dallas Morning News reported.
The changes are part of an effort to selectively ”streamline” information in history classes for some 5.4 million schoolchildren.
As a part of the board’s assessment, each historical figure was given a numerical importance rating from one to 20 by committee members, according to the newspaper. Clinton, the first woman in U.S. history to win a presidential nomination by a major political party, only ranked a five. Keller, a writer and activist born in 1888 who was the first deaf and blind American to earn a college degree, rated a seven.
Local members of the Texas legislature rated a 20. All students are required to learn about the current U.S. president, so Donald Trump was not assessed.
Texas Monthly reported that board members had considered cutting a “value-laden” phrase about “all the heroic defenders who gave their lives” in the 1836 battle of the Alamo against Mexican soldiers in what was then Mexican Texas. One state official called it “politically correct nonsense,” and the board chose not to drop it.
“In Texas, you don’t mess with the Alamo and you don’t mess with our Christian heritage,” Texas Values President Jonathan M. Saenz said in a statement. “We applaud the majority of the State Board of Education for doing the right thing by restoring our foundational rights and history.”
The vote is preliminary and may still change. The final vote is in November.
The annual decisions are often controversial.

Saturday, September 15, 2018

The Seekers


                                                             I'll Never Find Another You

Bill Maher from 9/14/18 - Makes My Point


Friday, September 14, 2018

Jeb Bush Calling Out Trump

By Mary Papenfuss

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) slammed President Donald Trump’s tweet earlier in the day, which falsely claimed the death toll of 3,000 in last year’s Puerto Rico hurricane was a fake number concocted by the Democrats, calling it “incredibly disheartening.”

Some on Twitter found his “disheartening” dig too soft. Others wondered why his brother George W. Bush was kicking off a fundraising drive for Republicans, including those who embrace Trump.

The 3,000 estimate comes from a George Washington University scientific analysis that included “excess deaths” attributed to the lingering effects of Hurricane Maria. Trump offered no evidence that the Democrats cooked up the number.

Cara Mia


                                                               Jay and the Americans

Fall Is On Its Way




I live about 50 miles from the Canadian border, so Fall usually comes earlier here than most of the United States. This week the high temperatures have been close to 80 F. We have already had some cold nights and some of the leaves have started to change color. That process will quicken. By Monday and for the foreseeable future, the daily high temperatures will not get above the mid 50's F.

The weather (recently) has been beautiful. Warm days, cool nights, dry, and clear night skies for star gazing. Perfect for all outdoor sports and sleeping. The weather will get even better (in my opinion) over the next 8 weeks. The trees will look like a rainbow. The bugs will start to disappear. I will light fires to keep the house warm, it's a little to early to turn on the furnace. Yes, we will get cold rains and the occasional snow and certainly some big storms as Winter pushes in, but I love Fall.

This will be my 64th Winter living in a Winter State. I have seen record bad weather. Blizzards, sub-zero cold, and unbelievable amounts of snow. I hope this Winter is better than last Winter. Last Winter was the coldest I could remember. We had 25-30 below zero  F temperatures for so many days in a row, it became normal. At those temperatures the physics of the air changes. Scientists come up here to do their experiments. Local weather guys love to throw a bucket of water in the air and watch if freeze before it his the ground, on live TV.

I can certainly understand why the older people get, the more they move down South. Some of my friends have already moved South and many others plan to move South as soon as they retire. The wealthy ones have homes both here and down South and move back and forth between Summer and Winter. I am not in that position and will live here til I die, although, I do play the lottery. It's probably true that people live longer in a warmer climate, but we have plenty of folks in their 90's and even over 100.

Hope your Fall is beautiful!  


Thursday, September 13, 2018

Unchained Melody


                                                                   Righteous Brothers

You Are On Your Own Folks!

A category 4 storm is heading for the Southern coast of the United States. You can click on Weather under my Informational Site links to get the up to date predictions and radar maps.

This is going to be a big blow! They call it hurricane Florence.

But don't worry, Trump says he has this covered.

Dismiss the story I posted yesterday, that the Trump administration took 10 million dollars from FEMA to give to immigration to house children under arrest, because Trump claims that would not take money from storm rescue efforts. Right!

Trump claims his administrations best effort was against hurricane Maria, which devistated Puerto Rico. 3,000 people died. The power was out for over a year, but this was (according to Trump) his administrations best effort!

You are on your own folks! The mandatory evacuation order has already been given. God help you, but don't count on Trump to help you.

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

Glenn Miller



                                                                        In The Mood

Another Trump Scandal

Homeland Security Shifted $10 Million From FEMA For Immigrant Crackdown, Senator Says

By Nick Visser and Roque Planas


The Trump administration transferred nearly $10 million from the Federal Emergency Management Agency earlier this year to fund immigrant detention and deportation efforts, according to a document released Tuesday by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore).
The lawmaker first shared the documents with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, saying that the Department of Homeland Security requested the money “just as hurricane season [was] starting” and as it was attempting to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the midst of its new “zero tolerance” immigration policy. The controversial crackdown resulted in the separation of thousands of migrant children from their parents, hundreds of whom have yet to be reunited.
“This is a scandal. At the start of hurricane season — when American citizens in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are still suffering from FEMA’s inadequate recovery efforts — the administration transferred millions of dollars away from FEMA,” Merkley said in a statement to HuffPost. “And for what? To implement their profoundly misguided ‘zero tolerance’ policy. It wasn’t enough to rip thousands of children out of the arms of their parents — the administration chose to partly pay for this horrific program by taking away from the ability to respond to damage from this year’s upcoming and potentially devastating hurricane season.”

The document’s release comes just days before Hurricane Florence, a powerful Category 4 storm, is expected to make landfall in the Carolinas. Millions of people are currently evacuating or hunkering down.
“$10 million comes out of FEMA when we’re facing a hurricane season knowing what’s happened last year,” Merkley told Maddow on Tuesday. “And look what we’ve had since, a hurricane just barely miss Hawaii. ... Now we have this hurricane, Florence, bearing down on the Carolinas.”
DHS spokesman Tyler Houlton late Tuesday called the senator’s appearance a “sorry attempt to push a false agenda,” saying the administration was instead “focused on assisting millions on the East Coast facing a catastrophic disaster.”
“The money in question — transferred to ICE from FEMA’s routine operating expenses — could not have been used for hurricane response due to appropriation limitations,” Houlton wrote on Twitter. “DHS/FEMA stand fiscally and operationally ready to support current and future response and recovery needs.”

The document released by Merkley, which was supplied to HuffPost, states that more than $2.3 million from a total of about $9.8 million had been diverted from FEMA’s “response and recovery” budget. Other funding was transferred from regional operations, mitigation efforts, preparedness and protection, and mission support budgets.
The amount transferred is less than 1 percent of FEMA’s budget for the fiscal year, according to the document, which also notes that the agency’s “mission impact” would be minimized as FEMA would only be required to “curtail training, travel, public engagement sessions, IT security support and infrastructure maintenance, and IT investments.”
The Department of Homeland Security has the authority to move a limited amount of money around within its budget. In the past, Congress had limited DHS from shuffling more than $5 million from one approved program to another through the process known as “reprogramming.”

A coalition of human rights groups penned a letter on June 27 asking the Senate Committee on Appropriations to oppose attempts by DHS to up the amount of funding for immigrant detention, accusing the department of “dramatically overspending its appropriated budget in ways both morally reprehensible and fiscally irresponsible.”
The $10 million of additional funds that DHS aims to use to expand immigrant detention amounts to less than 1 percent of the ICE budget for locking up immigrants, which tops $1.4 billion.